Difference between revisions of "N-main"

From Knowledge Federation
Jump to: navigation, search
m
Line 24: Line 24:
 
<p>Another reason why I want to speak in my natural human voice is that I want this to be an outcry; because the first step—before anything else can be done—is to break the spell of academic routine business as usual; and <em>all</em> unreflected business as usual; which is what the dialog will be about. </p>  
 
<p>Another reason why I want to speak in my natural human voice is that I want this to be an outcry; because the first step—before anything else can be done—is to break the spell of academic routine business as usual; and <em>all</em> unreflected business as usual; which is what the dialog will be about. </p>  
  
<p>This website complements my <em>Liberation</em> book, which is about to come out in print. The book will tell stories called [[vignette|<em>vignettes</em>]]. And through stories present a wealth of information and ideas as material for the dialog. Here I'll let knowledge federation speak for itself, in its own language. Federation through Keywords will
+
<p>This website complements my <em>Liberation</em> book, which is about to come out in print. The book will tell stories called [[vignette|<em>vignettes</em>]]. And through stories present a wealth of information and ideas as material for the dialog. Here I'll let knowledge federation speak for itself, in its own language. In Federation through Keywords I'll define and use a handful of custom-defined terms, which are necessary for comprehending what goes on. In Federation through Ideograms I'll use three simple metaphorical images. In Federation through Prototypes you'll see how information is taken into concerted action, empowered to make a difference. In Federation through Action I'll point out what exactly I propose as the next two steps—to make the sort of difference that must be made. </p>
  
<p>
+
<p> </p>  
offers what conventional information failed to provide</p>  
+
<p> </p>  
<p>Technically or academically, knowledge federation is a transdiscipline—a new kind of system altogether; which complements the academic disciplines and the media informing as weknow it.</p>  
+
<p> </p>  
  
<h3>The function of a transdiscipline is qualified knowledge of life's basic themes</h3>  
+
[[File:Signature.jpg]] <br><center>[[Dino Karabeg]]</small>
  
<p>Which reflects the information scattered through disciplines, cultural traditions etc; and informs us about core issues of our lives and times.</p>
 
  
<h3>We have developed a complete prototype of the knowledge federation transdiscipline</h3>
 
 
<p> comprising all that constitutes an academic discipline—from epistemology and methodology to a community of state-of-the-art researchers and portfolio of examples of application. </p>
 
 
<h3>Our call to action is to institute knowledge federation</h3>
 
 
<p>So that information can make the sort of difference it can and must make, in this age</p>
 
 
<p>we here as simply as we are able explain the point of it all. </p>
 
<p>We let knowledge federation turn to itself—and explain its own vision; its own reason for ecistence. Instead of presenting you all the details—and burying you in data. And let the further details emerge through interaction</p>
 
 
</div>
 
</div>
 
<div class="col-md-3 "> [[File:Mead.jpg]] <br><small><center>[[Margaret Mead]]</center></small>
 
<div class="col-md-3 "> [[File:Mead.jpg]] <br><small><center>[[Margaret Mead]]</center></small>
 
</div></div>
 
</div></div>

Revision as of 09:12, 19 October 2023

“We are living in a period of extraordinary danger, as we are faced with the possibility that our whole species will be eliminated from the evolutionary scene. One necessary condition of successfully continuing our existence is the creation of an atmosphere of hope that the huge problems now confronting us can, in fact, be solved—and can be solved in time.”


(Margaret Mead, Continuities in Cultural Evolution, 1964)

I am about to advance a radical proposal.

Radical both by going to roots of a matter—and by being thoroughly game-changing.

I propose to institute and empower transdisciplinarity.

And use it as Archimedean point to respond incisively to "the huge problems now confonting us"

By igniting an evolutionary quantum leap; or more technically speaking—a paradigm shift. </p>

This proposal is operationalized and made concrete by offering knowledge federation as a complete prototype of a transdiscipline; ready to be examined, tested and taken into production.

Although the knowledge federation prototype is the result of work of many excellent people—after giving this matter some thought, I decided to make a case for it by speaking in the first person; a reason is that I don't want to hide behind academic formulations or other people; but make a statement as clearly as I can, and stand accountable in front of you with what I said.

I am by background a theoretical scientist, practically a mathematician. So from an academic point of view, my work is completely rigorous, as mathematical axioms and theorems are. I will, however, here speak informally—and only point to the rigorous side of this work; and let you discover it through the public dialog that will be the first step toward implementing this proposal. Two ethical axioms are all I expect from you: The human axiom is that we the people must do what we can to begin the process of recovery; NOT leave to our children the mess. The academic axiom is that we need to build on knowledge—not ignore it.

I am prepared to show that those two compel us to take the steps I am proposing.

Another reason why I want to speak in my natural human voice is that I want this to be an outcry; because the first step—before anything else can be done—is to break the spell of academic routine business as usual; and all unreflected business as usual; which is what the dialog will be about.

This website complements my Liberation book, which is about to come out in print. The book will tell stories called vignettes. And through stories present a wealth of information and ideas as material for the dialog. Here I'll let knowledge federation speak for itself, in its own language. In Federation through Keywords I'll define and use a handful of custom-defined terms, which are necessary for comprehending what goes on. In Federation through Ideograms I'll use three simple metaphorical images. In Federation through Prototypes you'll see how information is taken into concerted action, empowered to make a difference. In Federation through Action I'll point out what exactly I propose as the next two steps—to make the sort of difference that must be made.

Signature.jpg
Dino Karabeg</small>


</div>

Mead.jpg
<center>Margaret Mead</center>
</div>