Difference between pages "Holotopia" and "Holotopia: Five insights"

From Knowledge Federation
(Difference between pages)
Jump to: navigation, search
m
 
m
 
Line 1: Line 1:
<div class="page-header" ><h1>Holotopia</h1></div>
+
<div class="page-header" > <h1>Holotopia: Five insights</h1> </div>
  
 
<div class="row">
 
<div class="row">
<div class="col-md-3"><h4></h4></div>
+
<div class="col-md-3"><h4>Seeing things whole</h4></div>
<div class="col-md-7"><p>
+
<div class="col-md-7">
[[File:Box1.jpg]]
+
<p>The point, the absolutely <em>main</em> point here, is the change of the way we look at things. We leave our traditional candles aside, and use the flashlight. <em>What do we see</em>?</p>
Think about the world at the twilight of the Middle Ages and the dawn of the Renaissance: devastating religious wars, terrifying epidemics… Imagine Galilei in house arrest, whispering “eppur si muove” into his beard. Recall that the problems of the epoch were not resolved by focusing on those problems, but by a slow and steady development of an entirely new approach to knowledge. Several centuries of comprehensive and accelerated evolution followed. Could a similar advent be in store for us today?</p>  
+
<p>Each of these <em>five insights</em> is a result of applying this this way of looking to a bundle of core issues—and seeing them in a <em>completely</em> new light. We are also building the analogy between our own time and the time of Galilei. So...</p>
 +
</div> </div>
 +
 
 +
<div class="row">
 +
<div class="col-md-3"><h4>The next Renaissance</h4></div>
 +
<div class="col-md-7">
 +
<p>The Renaissance liberated our ancestors to seek happiness here and now. The arts blossomed, the daily culture changed beyond recognition. Can we experience something similar now? And if so – HOW?</p>
 +
<p>What is it that we failed to see in the light of the candle? First of all the <em>inner</em>—our very <em>ability to feel</em>. And then the <em>long-term</em>—how what we do influences our happiness in the long run. You may be glad to hear that those two are really two sides of a single coin!</p>
 +
<p>See the [[Holotopia:Convenience Paradox insight|Convenience Paradox]] insight.</p>  
 
</div> </div>  
 
</div> </div>  
 +
 
<div class="row">
 
<div class="row">
<div class="col-md-3"><h4>Holoscope</h4></div>
+
<div class="col-md-3"><h4>The next Industrial Revolution</h4></div>
<div class="col-md-6"><p>
+
<div class="col-md-7">
We have recently completed and documented a [[prototype|<em>prototype</em>]] of a candidate new approach to knowledge, and called it [[knowledge federation|<em>knowledge federation</em>]]. The mission of <em>holotopia</em> is to complete that [[prototype|<em>prototype</em>]], by [[knowledge federation|<em>federating</em>]]  [[knowledge federation|<em>federate</em>]]. </p>  
+
<p>Is a <em>radical</em> increase in the effectiveness and efficiency of human work <em>still</em> possible (analogous to what resulted by the Industrial Revoluton)? And if so—how could we fail to see that?</p>
<p>In <em>holotopia</em> we represent <em>knowledge federation</em> by the pseudonym <em>holoscope</em>; and we use <em>knowledge federation</em> (or [[knowledge federation|<em>federation</em>]]) as a verb.</p>  
+
<p>We focused on making the already small things even smaller. And smarter. And neglected completely those <em>huge</em> and far more important ones: <em>the systems in which we live and work</em>!</p>  
<p>We define the <em>holoscope</em> by the [[ideogram|<em>ideogram</em>]] on the right, with the help of the one below. The <em>holoscope</em> is the suitable new 'headlights', designed to be used for illuminating themes, issues and directions. The <em>holoscope</em> can be pointed at any theme or issue. By illuminating what has remained obscure or hidden, it lets us it as a whole – its undistorted shape, and correct proportions.</p>  
+
<p>See the [[Holotopia:Power Structure insight|Power Structure]] insight.</p>  
</div>
 
<div class="col-md-3">
 
[[File:Bussy.jpg]]
 
 
</div> </div>  
 
</div> </div>  
  
 
<div class="row">
 
<div class="row">
<div class="col-md-3"><h4></h4></div>
+
<div class="col-md-3"><h4>The next Gutenberg</h4></div>
 
<div class="col-md-7">
 
<div class="col-md-7">
[[File:Perspective-S.jpg]]
+
<p>Some researchers ascribe all of it Gutenberg: It was the revolution in <em>communication</em> that enabled the spreading of knowledge, literacy, education — and all the rest followed. Can you imagine a similar revolution in communication, with similar consequences, happening once again in our time? "But wait a minute," you might say, "hasn't such a revolution just recently happened? <em>What else</em> is there that could still surprise us?"</p>
 +
<p>We look at the <em>algorithm</em>. If you think of the Web as a kind of a gigantic machine, call it a computer, connecting us all—the question is <em>what program is this thing running</em>? Is it efficient? Is it at all <em>working</em>? So yes, the 'hardware' is now in place. And the 'software' is yet to be created...</p>
 +
<p>See the [[Holotopia:Collective Mind insight|Collective Mind]] insight.</p>
 +
</div> </div>
  
 +
<div class="row">
 +
<div class="col-md-3"><h4>The next Enlightenment</h4></div>
 +
<div class="col-md-7">
 +
<p>And now the deep root, the point of it all. What <em>really</em> fueled the big change was a change in the very foundations of things. That was also the reason why Galilei was in house arrest. It was his claim that when the reason contradicts the Scriptures it might still be legitimate to listen to the reason that was the most disruptive and dangerous piece in it all. Everything else followed. Can you imagine <em>that</em> sort of change happening in our time?</p>
 +
<p>The way of looking now is to see the foundations of our culture. The hidden judgment what's "true", "good", "right"...</p>
 +
<p>See the [[Holotopia:Socialized Reality insight|Socialized Reality]] insight.</p>
 
</div> </div>  
 
</div> </div>  
  
 +
<div class="row">
 +
<div class="col-md-3"><h4>The next science</h4></div>
 +
<div class="col-md-7">
 +
<p>Science, of course, was the engine of development. Understanding the nature, understanding ourselves and the world, in completely new terms, incomparably more accurate and precise. Is a revolution here too possible—in the very way in which we look at the world?</p>
 +
<p>We look at our very way of looking. We look at our 'eyeglasses'...</p>
 +
<p>See the [[Holotopia:Narrow Frame|Narrow Frame]] insight.</p>
 +
</div> </div>
  
 
<div class="row">
 
<div class="row">
<div class="col-md-3"><h4>Proof of concept application</h4></div>
+
<div class="col-md-3"><h4>The insights</h4></div>
 +
 
 
<div class="col-md-7">
 
<div class="col-md-7">
[[File:Peccei-Future.jpeg]]
+
[[File:FiveInsights.JPG]]
<p>Can new headlights make a difference?</p>  
+
<p>Each of these <em>five insights</em> leads to a <em>gestalt</em> change related to a collection of interests or issues; and to a  change of the perception and the handling of those interests or issues. Hence each of them provides a vivid, moving snapshot of the <em>holotopia</em>'s overall Renaissance scenario: Our contemporary condition is seen in a similar light as we might see the mindset of the Middle Ages. Change becomes imperative. </p>
<p>The goal of <em>holotopia</em> is to find a way to change course – and thereby show that the [[holoscope|<em>holoscope</em>]] works.</p>  
+
<p>Each insight is reached by illuminating some whole. Each insight reinforces [[wholeness|<em>wholeness</em>]] as value. Hence each insight independently of others supports the basic premises of [[holotopia|<em>holotopia</em>]] and [[holoscope|<em>holoscope</em>]]. </p>
 
</div> </div>  
 
</div> </div>  
  
 
<div class="row">
 
<div class="row">
<div class="col-md-3"><h4>Holotopia vision</h4></div>
+
<div class="col-md-3"><h4>Relationships among insights</h4></div>
 +
 
 
<div class="col-md-7">
 
<div class="col-md-7">
<p>When the new 'headlights' are used, what results is a cleear vision of the <em>holotopia</em> – and of 'course' that takes us there</p>  
+
<p>At the same time, the causal relationships between these insights show that the corresponding problems create one another. That together they form a vicious cycle. The synergistic relationships between them show that resolving one would imply or require, resolving the next in line. Hence we see that while each of the specific insights calls for a profound change of perception and action in a certain area – that specific change becomes possible, or even easy, only in the context of the comprehensive change. A clear vision of [[holotopia|<em>holotopia</em>]] results.  </p> </div> </div>
<p>The <em>holotopia</em> is a more desirable vision of the future than the common utopias tend to be. Yet it is practically realizable. The reason is that we already own the knowledge needed for its fulfillment.</p>
+
 
<p>Margaret Mead wrote:
+
<div class="row">
<blockquote>One necessary condition of successfully continuing our existence is the creation of an atmosphere of hope that the huge problems now confronting us can, in fact, be solved—and can be solved in time."
+
<div class="col-md-3"><h4>Links to details</h4></div>
</blockquote>  
+
 
The <em>holotopia</em> vision achieves that, and significantly more—it provides for an engagement where we are not "solving problems", but <em>building</em> a human condition that is radically better than what we have today.</p>  
+
<div class="col-md-7">
 +
{|
 +
| style="padding: 10px" |  '''Acr'''
 +
| style="padding: 10px" |  '''Insight'''
 +
| style="padding: 10px" |  '''Domain'''
 +
| style="padding: 10px" |  '''Causes'''
 +
| style="padding: 10px" |  '''Enables'''
 +
|-
 +
| style="padding: 10px" |  '''PS'''
 +
| style="padding: 10px" |  [[Power structure insight|Power structure]]
 +
| style="padding: 10px" |  Innovation, global issues, democracy
 +
| style="padding: 10px" |  [[Who made up our mind|PS ➡︎ CM]]
 +
| style="padding: 10px" |  [[First step to liberation|PS ➯ SR]]
 +
|-
 +
| style="padding: 10px" |  '''CM'''
 +
| style="padding: 10px" |  [[Collective mind insight|Collective mind]]
 +
| style="padding: 10px" |  Media, IT, communication, knowledge work
 +
| style="padding: 10px" |  [[Why the homo ludens propsered|CM ➡︎ SR]]
 +
| style="padding: 10px" |  [[The knowledge we need|CM ➯ NF]]
 +
|-
 +
| style="padding: 10px" |  '''SR'''
 +
| style="padding: 10px" |  [[Socialized reality insight|Socialized reality]]
 +
| style="padding: 10px" |  Epistemology
 +
| style="padding: 10px" | [[Reification is limitation|SR ➡︎ NF]]
 +
| style="padding: 10px" |  [[Steps toward cultural revival|SR ➯ CP]]
 +
|-
 +
| style="padding: 10px" |  '''NF'''
 +
| style="padding: 10px" | [[Narrow frame insight|Narrow frame]]
 +
| style="padding: 10px" | Worldview
 +
| style="padding: 10px" |  [[Fool's gold|NF ➡︎ CP]]
 +
| style="padding: 10px" |  [[Look who's hiding in the dark|NF ➯ PS]]
 +
|-
 +
| style="padding: 10px" |  '''CP'''
 +
| style="padding: 10px" |  [[Convenience paradox insight|Convenience paradox]]
 +
| style="padding: 10px" |  Values, culture, pursuit of happiness, religion
 +
| style="padding: 10px" |  [[There is no invisible hand|CP ➡︎ PS]]
 +
| style="padding: 10px" |  [[Regaining sanity|CP ➯ CM]]
 +
|}
 +
</div> </div>
 +
 
 +
<div class="row">
 +
<div class="col-md-3"><h4>The next Englightenment</h4></div>
 +
<div class="col-md-7">
 +
[[File:Peccei_Revival.jpg]]
 +
<p>The five insights complete the vision of an Englightenment-like change:
 +
<ul> <li> The <em>convenience paradox</em> evokes a parallel with the Renaissance, where a radical change of values empowered our ancestors to pursue happiness in <em>this</em> world; and to develop the arts, relationships, ways to be human</li>
 +
<li>The <em>power structure</em> should remind of the Industrial Revolution, which brought a dramatic improvement of effectiveness and efficiency of human work; and also of the advent of the democracy and other great institutional innovations</li>
 +
<li>The <em>collective mind</em> is about a development analogous to the invention of the printing press, and the corresponding revolution in knowledge and communication</p>  
 +
<li>The <em>socialized reality</em> points to a change analogous to the dramatic improvement of the <em>foundations</em> on which truth and meaning are constructed—and then of course all the rest</li>
 +
<li>The <em>narrow frame</em> should remind of the advent of science</li>
 +
</ul>
 +
</p>  
 +
<p>So the bottom two should remind of the development that Galilei in house arrest stands for—where the spontaneous evolution of knowledge of knowledge brings forth a new revolutionary, disruptive change; the upper three insights point to the sweeping consequences that such change may now bring along.</p>
 +
</div> </div>
 +
 
 +
 
 +
<div class="row">
 +
<div class="col-md-3"><h4>Perceiving relationships</h4></div>
 +
<div class="col-md-7">
 +
[[File:Power Structure.jpg]]
 +
<p>This most central, "bonus" insight result when we put all the above insights together.</p> 
 +
<p>Rendered by the <em>power structure</em> <em>keyword</em> and <em>ideogram</em> is that the <em>power structure</em> should best be considered as combining power interests with our ideas and with our own condition. The point is that the power interests can modify both.</p>
 +
<p>As a [[keyword|<em>keyword</em>]], the [[power structures|<em>power structure</em>]] models the intuitive notions "enemy", and "power holder".</p>  
 +
 
 
</div> </div>  
 
</div> </div>  
 +
  
 
<div class="row">
 
<div class="row">
<div class="col-md-3"><h4>Holotopia prototype</h4></div>
+
<div class="col-md-3"><h4>Perceiving evolution</h4></div>
 
<div class="col-md-7">
 
<div class="col-md-7">
[[File:H side.png]]
+
[[File:Bauman-msg.jpeg]]
<p>Holotopia is an art project, and an art direction. It wakes us up, ignites vision, disrupts complacency, reinvigorates evolution.</p>
+
<p>The [[power structures|<em>power structure</em>]] model is completed by including insights about the evolution of our institutions or socio-technical systems, or <em>power structures</em>: When guided by <em>egocenteredness</em>, or by "free market" or "free competition", the <em>power structures</em> result naturally. They tend to evolve pathologically, as socio-cultural cancer...</p>  
<p>The mission of [[Holotopia:Prototype|Holotopia as a prototype]] or project is to develop whatever is needed for "changing course" – and realizing the <em>holotopia</em>. </p>
+
<p>The enemy is the system – which is us! There is nobody to blame. Re-evolution is the way. </p>  
<p>We present it here in terms of
+
<p>Instead of trusting "the invisible hand" – we consider ourselves liable for systemic wholeness. We use our creative powers NOT as the market demands – but to ensure systemic wholeness.</p>
<ul>
+
<p>Corrective action is [[bootstrapping|<em>bootstrapping</em>]]!</p>  
<li>[[Holotopia:Five insights|Five insights]], which are alone sufficient to see how the <em>holotopia</em> vision naturally emerges from the knowledge we own</li>
+
</div></div>
<li>[[Holotopia:The box|The box]] – a ritual object designed for 'initiation' to <em>holotopia</em>, a way to help us 'unbox' our conception of the world and see, think and behave differently; change course inwardly, by embracing a new value</li>
 
<li>[[Holotopia:Virtual space|A virtual space]] – including physical spaces, with suitable affordances and group dynamics by which the [[holotopia|<em>holotopia</em>]] vision can be realized</li>  
 
<li>A collection of [[Holotopia:Keywords|keywords]] which – just as science did back then – encode a new way of speaking and thinking</li>  
 
<li>A [[Holotopia:Story|story]], where we [[knowledge federation|<em>federate</em>]] some of Margaret Mead's key ideas—which point to what's now necessary yet lacking, to make the <em>holotopia</em> possible (Mead is <em>holotopia</em>'s icon or [[giant|<em>giant</em>]])</li>
 
<li>A collection of [[Holotopia:Keywords|keywords]]—just as science did at its arrival, the <em>holoscope</em> too brings along a new way of looking at the world and speaking, which allows for new insights being reached and shared</li>
 
</ul> </p> </div> </div>  
 
  
 +
<div class="row">
 +
<div class="col-md-3"><h4>The bottom line</h4></div>
 +
<div class="col-md-7">
 +
<p>We may now easily see why white (as, we tentatively assume, the [[holotopia|<em>holotopia</em>]]'s all-inclusive color) is not only the new black – but indeed also the new green! And the new red!</p>
 +
<p>Vibeke didn't like this (private joke of mine), yet she may...</p>
 +
<blockquote><pre>
 +
But seek ye first the systemic wholeness,
 +
in all matters and on all levels detail;
 +
and all these things shall be added unto you.
 +
</pre>
 +
</blockquote>
 +
</div> </div>
  
 
<div class="row">
 
<div class="row">
<div class="col-md-3"></div>
+
<div class="col-md-3"><h4>Or in other words</h4></div>
 
<div class="col-md-6">
 
<div class="col-md-6">
<p>
+
<p>This young man might <em>seem</em> to be a fool. But his archetype is indeed the one of <em>wisdom</em>! By looking at the big picture, at the whole thing, by using the golden rule of <em>wholeness</em> – he succeeds in handling the everyday complexities effortlessly and <em>more</em> effectively!</p> </div>  
The story explains the exact mission of <em>holotopia</em> by [[knowledge federation|<em>federating</em>]] Margaret Mead's familiar dictum:
+
<div class="col-md-3">
<blockquote>
+
[[File:Fool.jpg]]
Never doubt that a small group of thoughtful, committed citizens can change the world; indeed, it's the only thing that ever has.
+
</div> </div>
</blockquote>
 
What exactly distinguishes "a small group of thoughtful, committed citizens" that is able to make a world of difference? It is exactly <em>that</em> key idea that the Holotopia undertakes to <em>federate</em>. </p> </div>  
 
<div class="col-md-3 round-images">
 
[[File:Mead.jpg]]
 
  
</div> </div>
+
* Back to [[holotopia]]

Revision as of 15:59, 6 March 2020

Seeing things whole

The point, the absolutely main point here, is the change of the way we look at things. We leave our traditional candles aside, and use the flashlight. What do we see?

Each of these five insights is a result of applying this this way of looking to a bundle of core issues—and seeing them in a completely new light. We are also building the analogy between our own time and the time of Galilei. So...

The next Renaissance

The Renaissance liberated our ancestors to seek happiness here and now. The arts blossomed, the daily culture changed beyond recognition. Can we experience something similar now? And if so – HOW?

What is it that we failed to see in the light of the candle? First of all the inner—our very ability to feel. And then the long-term—how what we do influences our happiness in the long run. You may be glad to hear that those two are really two sides of a single coin!

See the Convenience Paradox insight.

The next Industrial Revolution

Is a radical increase in the effectiveness and efficiency of human work still possible (analogous to what resulted by the Industrial Revoluton)? And if so—how could we fail to see that?

We focused on making the already small things even smaller. And smarter. And neglected completely those huge and far more important ones: the systems in which we live and work!

See the Power Structure insight.

The next Gutenberg

Some researchers ascribe all of it Gutenberg: It was the revolution in communication that enabled the spreading of knowledge, literacy, education — and all the rest followed. Can you imagine a similar revolution in communication, with similar consequences, happening once again in our time? "But wait a minute," you might say, "hasn't such a revolution just recently happened? What else is there that could still surprise us?"

We look at the algorithm. If you think of the Web as a kind of a gigantic machine, call it a computer, connecting us all—the question is what program is this thing running? Is it efficient? Is it at all working? So yes, the 'hardware' is now in place. And the 'software' is yet to be created...

See the Collective Mind insight.

The next Enlightenment

And now the deep root, the point of it all. What really fueled the big change was a change in the very foundations of things. That was also the reason why Galilei was in house arrest. It was his claim that when the reason contradicts the Scriptures it might still be legitimate to listen to the reason that was the most disruptive and dangerous piece in it all. Everything else followed. Can you imagine that sort of change happening in our time?

The way of looking now is to see the foundations of our culture. The hidden judgment what's "true", "good", "right"...

See the Socialized Reality insight.

The next science

Science, of course, was the engine of development. Understanding the nature, understanding ourselves and the world, in completely new terms, incomparably more accurate and precise. Is a revolution here too possible—in the very way in which we look at the world?

We look at our very way of looking. We look at our 'eyeglasses'...

See the Narrow Frame insight.

The insights

FiveInsights.JPG

Each of these five insights leads to a gestalt change related to a collection of interests or issues; and to a change of the perception and the handling of those interests or issues. Hence each of them provides a vivid, moving snapshot of the holotopia's overall Renaissance scenario: Our contemporary condition is seen in a similar light as we might see the mindset of the Middle Ages. Change becomes imperative.

Each insight is reached by illuminating some whole. Each insight reinforces wholeness as value. Hence each insight independently of others supports the basic premises of holotopia and holoscope.

Relationships among insights

At the same time, the causal relationships between these insights show that the corresponding problems create one another. That together they form a vicious cycle. The synergistic relationships between them show that resolving one would imply or require, resolving the next in line. Hence we see that while each of the specific insights calls for a profound change of perception and action in a certain area – that specific change becomes possible, or even easy, only in the context of the comprehensive change. A clear vision of holotopia results.

Links to details

Acr Insight Domain Causes Enables
PS Power structure Innovation, global issues, democracy PS ➡︎ CM PS ➯ SR
CM Collective mind Media, IT, communication, knowledge work CM ➡︎ SR CM ➯ NF
SR Socialized reality Epistemology SR ➡︎ NF SR ➯ CP
NF Narrow frame Worldview NF ➡︎ CP NF ➯ PS
CP Convenience paradox Values, culture, pursuit of happiness, religion CP ➡︎ PS CP ➯ CM

The next Englightenment

Peccei Revival.jpg

The five insights complete the vision of an Englightenment-like change:

  • The convenience paradox evokes a parallel with the Renaissance, where a radical change of values empowered our ancestors to pursue happiness in this world; and to develop the arts, relationships, ways to be human
  • The power structure should remind of the Industrial Revolution, which brought a dramatic improvement of effectiveness and efficiency of human work; and also of the advent of the democracy and other great institutional innovations
  • The collective mind is about a development analogous to the invention of the printing press, and the corresponding revolution in knowledge and communication</p>
  • The socialized reality points to a change analogous to the dramatic improvement of the foundations on which truth and meaning are constructed—and then of course all the rest
  • The narrow frame should remind of the advent of science
  • </ul> </p>

    So the bottom two should remind of the development that Galilei in house arrest stands for—where the spontaneous evolution of knowledge of knowledge brings forth a new revolutionary, disruptive change; the upper three insights point to the sweeping consequences that such change may now bring along.

</div>


Perceiving relationships

Power Structure.jpg

This most central, "bonus" insight result when we put all the above insights together.

Rendered by the power structure keyword and ideogram is that the power structure should best be considered as combining power interests with our ideas and with our own condition. The point is that the power interests can modify both.

As a keyword, the power structure models the intuitive notions "enemy", and "power holder".


Perceiving evolution

Bauman-msg.jpeg

The power structure model is completed by including insights about the evolution of our institutions or socio-technical systems, or power structures: When guided by egocenteredness, or by "free market" or "free competition", the power structures result naturally. They tend to evolve pathologically, as socio-cultural cancer...

The enemy is the system – which is us! There is nobody to blame. Re-evolution is the way.

Instead of trusting "the invisible hand" – we consider ourselves liable for systemic wholeness. We use our creative powers NOT as the market demands – but to ensure systemic wholeness.

Corrective action is bootstrapping!

The bottom line

We may now easily see why white (as, we tentatively assume, the holotopia's all-inclusive color) is not only the new black – but indeed also the new green! And the new red!

Vibeke didn't like this (private joke of mine), yet she may...

But seek ye first the systemic wholeness,
in all matters and on all levels detail; 
and all these things shall be added unto you.

Or in other words

This young man might seem to be a fool. But his archetype is indeed the one of wisdom! By looking at the big picture, at the whole thing, by using the golden rule of wholeness – he succeeds in handling the everyday complexities effortlessly and more effectively!

Fool.jpg