Difference between pages "Socialized reality insight" and "Narrow frame insight"

From Knowledge Federation
(Difference between pages)
Jump to: navigation, search
m
 
m
 
Line 1: Line 1:
−
<div class="page-header" ><h1>Five Insights: Socialized Reality</h1></div>
+
<div class="page-header" ><h1>Five Insights: Narrow Frame</h1></div>
−
 
 
  
 
When we begin to use knowledge to show us what we don't see, so that we may see a theme or an issue as a whole, a vision of a world on the brink of change results; and of a whole new order of things, which is ready to emerge. We call the emerging order of things the [[holotopia|<em>holotopia</em>]]. The  [[five insights|<em>five insights</em>]] are selected as sufficient to see the [[holotopia|<em>holotopia</em>]].  
 
When we begin to use knowledge to show us what we don't see, so that we may see a theme or an issue as a whole, a vision of a world on the brink of change results; and of a whole new order of things, which is ready to emerge. We call the emerging order of things the [[holotopia|<em>holotopia</em>]]. The  [[five insights|<em>five insights</em>]] are selected as sufficient to see the [[holotopia|<em>holotopia</em>]].  
  
−
<p>The Socialized Reality insight, which is introduced here, is one of them.</p>  
+
<p>The Narrow Frame insight, which is introduced here, is one of them.</p>  
  
 
<div class="row">
 
<div class="row">
 
<div class="col-md-3"><h4>Ideogram</h4></div>
 
<div class="col-md-3"><h4>Ideogram</h4></div>
 
<div class="col-md-7">
 
<div class="col-md-7">
−
[[File:Ideogram-placeholder.jpg]]  
+
[[File:Polyscopy.jpg]]
 
<p>
 
<p>
−
This <em>ideogram</em> is only a placeholder. The real thing should be a house with failing foundation image – but we can talk about that...
+
We may need to update this [[ideogram|<em>ideogram</em>]]. And call it the Holoscope ideogram. The inscription should read "holoscope" instead of "polyscopy". There was also that eye on the left, which Fredrik thought was not necessary...</p>
 +
<p>Interpretation: Once we understood that the way of looking at things is OUR OWN (or our culture's) CREATION – we became ready to recreate it to see more. To see what needs to be seen.  
 
</p>
 
</p>
−
</div></div>
+
</div>
 +
</div>
 +
 
  
 
<div class="row">
 
<div class="row">
−
<div class="col-md-3"><h4>Intuitive idea</h4></div>
+
<div class="col-md-3"><h4>Insight</h4></div>
 
<div class="col-md-7">
 
<div class="col-md-7">
−
<p>The point here is to see the problems we have as cracks in a house with failing foundations. And that the rational next step is rebuilding, not fixing the cracks... The foundations are invisible. Including them is to culture as architecture is to house construction. </p>  
+
<p>Not only "the scientific method", but also our language represents the <em>narrow frame</em>. To see the whole, we must <em>create</em> the way we look at things.</p>  
 
</div></div>
 
</div></div>
  
−
<div class="row">
 
−
<div class="col-md-3"><h4>Pseudo-epistemology</h4></div>
 
−
<div class="col-md-7"><p>A key point here. The pair of antonyms – [[homo ludens|<em>homo ludens</em>]] and <em>homo sapiens</em> – has at its core another pari of antonyms – [[socialization|<em>socialization</em>]] and [[epistemology|<em>epistemology</em>]]. The latter relies on <em>knowledge of knowledge</em>. This latter on [[gestalt|<em>gestalt</em>]] acquired through socialization, and its perpetual confirmation as "what works". </p>
 
−
</div> </div>
 
−
 
−
<div class="row">
 
−
<div class="col-md-3"><h4>We are not rational choice makers</h4></div>
 
−
<div class="col-md-7">Our legao, democratic institutions... the way we've leg culture be created by advertising or more generally socialization...
 
−
</div> </div>
 
  
 
<div class="row">
 
<div class="row">
−
<div class="col-md-3"><h4>"Reality" is a turf!</h4></div>
+
<div class="col-md-3"><h4>Consequences</h4></div>
−
<div class="col-md-7"><p>This is one of the core points that Bourdieu left us. It's coded in the formula he keeps repeating, something like "the <em>habitus</em> is a structured structure and structuring structure ... The point is that once you structure the people's reality to be so and so (king is God's ordained ruler, and he owns it all)  – then this structure structures the reality for the next king to come. He doesn't need to do it again. </p>
 
−
<p>The Odin the Horse [[vignette|<em>vignette</em>]] comes in here to point to the (potential or actual) absurdity of the turf strife. There may be NO "real" gains whatsoever in victories... only symbolic ones...</p>
 
−
</div> </div>
 
−
 
 
−
<div class="row">
 
−
<div class="col-md-3"><h4>Academic tradition has brought us to the <em>mirror</em></h4></div>
 
−
<div class="col-md-7">Socrates started the tradition of [[epistemology|<em>epistemology</em>]] – by instructing people to question the roots of their beliefs. Especially when they are power based. Galilei and others improved the method. The point here is that we need to do this again. Not be busy, but come back to basic questions of meaning and purpose. Stop and self-reflect.</p>
 
−
<p> KF is a complete model of an academic reality on the other side – created to help the self-reflection, and the transition to the new paradigm.</p>
 
−
</div> </div>
 
−
 
 
−
 
 
−
<div class="row">
 
−
<div class="col-md-3"><h4>Insight</h4></div>
 
 
<div class="col-md-7">
 
<div class="col-md-7">
−
<p>What we thought was <em>the</em> solid foundation for truth and meaning, turned out to be a myth. </p>
+
<p>Scope design, polyscopy</p>  
−
<p>Socialization as an alternative to knowledge.</p>
 
−
<p>Socialization – a natural element of the traditional culture – no longer serves us. We need to rely on REAL knowledge.</p>  
 
 
</div></div>
 
</div></div>
−
 
  
 
<div class="row">
 
<div class="row">
 
<div class="col-md-3"><h4>Formulation</h4></div>
 
<div class="col-md-3"><h4>Formulation</h4></div>
 
<div class="col-md-7">
 
<div class="col-md-7">
−
<p>From the traditional culture we've adopted a myth incomparably more damaging and subversive than the myth of creation... We've thrown out the baby with the bathwater.</p>  
+
<p>Text</p>  
 
</div></div>
 
</div></div>
  
Line 63: Line 40:
 
<div class="col-md-3"><h4>Story</h4></div>
 
<div class="col-md-3"><h4>Story</h4></div>
 
<div class="col-md-7">
 
<div class="col-md-7">
−
<p>Bourdieu in Algeria. He saw two processes.</p>
+
<p>Heisenberg's quotation. How it got ignored.</p>  
−
<p>The first was the "modernization" of Algeria. As the war ended, and independence resulted – a completely <em>new</em> set of dependencies emerged. The result was the same. But in a much more subtle way!</p>
 
−
<p>The second was the destruction of culture. The Kabyle people ...</p>  
 
 
</div></div>
 
</div></div>
  
 
<div class="row">
 
<div class="row">
−
<div class="col-md-3"><h4>Dialog, not debate</h4></div>
+
<div class="col-md-3"><h4>Action</h4></div>
−
<div class="col-md-7">
 
−
<p>This of course goes quite deep – into <em>personal</em> foundation of knowing. Instead of holding on to our beliefs, we keep them fluid. We remain creative... We co-create...</p>
 
−
</div> </div>
 
−
 
 
−
<div class="row">
 
−
<div class="col-md-3"><h4>Federation, not puzzle solving</h4></div>
 
−
<div class="col-md-7"><p>Multiple versions are possible, and also necessary. Keeping them relatively – yet not obligatorily – consistent and coherent is what we are calling [[knowledge federation|<em>knowledge federation</em>]], isn't it?</p>
 
−
</div> </div>
 
−
 
 
−
<div class="row">
 
−
<div class="col-md-3"><h4>Design epistemology</h4></div>
 
 
<div class="col-md-7">
 
<div class="col-md-7">
−
<p>Design epistemology – information as systemic component</p>
+
<p>Text</p>  
−
<p>Information is not only, or even primarily, the facts about... The lion's share is <em>implicit</em>...</p>  
 
 
</div></div>
 
</div></div>
  
Line 89: Line 52:
 
<div class="col-md-3"><h4>Keywords</h4></div>
 
<div class="col-md-3"><h4>Keywords</h4></div>
 
<div class="col-md-7">
 
<div class="col-md-7">
−
<p>[[design epistemology|<em>design epistemology</em>]]</p>  
+
<p>Text</p>  
 
</div></div>
 
</div></div>
  
Line 95: Line 58:
 
<div class="col-md-3"><h4>Prototypes</h4></div>
 
<div class="col-md-3"><h4>Prototypes</h4></div>
 
<div class="col-md-7">
 
<div class="col-md-7">
−
<p>Design epistemology?</p>
+
<p>Concept definition prototypes</p>  
−
<p>Key point dialog?</p>  
 
 
</div></div>
 
</div></div>
−
 
  
 
* Back to [[five insights]].
 
* Back to [[five insights]].

Revision as of 15:16, 27 February 2020

Five Insights: Narrow Frame

When we begin to use knowledge to show us what we don't see, so that we may see a theme or an issue as a whole, a vision of a world on the brink of change results; and of a whole new order of things, which is ready to emerge. We call the emerging order of things the holotopia. The five insights are selected as sufficient to see the holotopia.

The Narrow Frame insight, which is introduced here, is one of them.

Ideogram

Polyscopy.jpg

We may need to update this ideogram. And call it the Holoscope ideogram. The inscription should read "holoscope" instead of "polyscopy". There was also that eye on the left, which Fredrik thought was not necessary...

Interpretation: Once we understood that the way of looking at things is OUR OWN (or our culture's) CREATION – we became ready to recreate it to see more. To see what needs to be seen.


Insight

Not only "the scientific method", but also our language represents the narrow frame. To see the whole, we must create the way we look at things.


Consequences

Scope design, polyscopy

Formulation

Text


Story

Heisenberg's quotation. How it got ignored.

Action

Text

Keywords

Text

Prototypes

Concept definition prototypes

Retrieved from "http://kf.wikiwiki.ifi.uio.no/index.php?title=Socialized_reality_insight&oldid=4000"