Difference between pages "Collective mind insight" and "Holotopia"

From Knowledge Federation
(Difference between pages)
Jump to: navigation, search
m
 
m
 
Line 1: Line 1:
<div class="page-header" ><h1>Five Insights: Collective Mind</h1></div>
+
<div class="page-header" ><h1>Keywords: <em>holotopia</em></h1></div>
  
When we begin to use knowledge to show us what we don't see, so that we may see a theme or an issue as a whole, a vision of a world on the brink of change results; and of a whole new order of things, which is ready to emerge. We call the emerging order of things the [[holotopia|<em>holotopia</em>]]. The  [[five insights|<em>five insights</em>]] are selected as sufficient to see the [[holotopia|<em>holotopia</em>]].
+
This article is about <em>holotopia</em> as a [[keyword|<em>keyword</em>]]. For the corresponding [[prototype|<em>prototype</em>]], see [[Prototypes: Holotopia|Holotopia <em>prototype</em>]].  
 
 
<p>The Collective Mind, which is introduced here, is one of them.</p>
 
 
 
 
 
<div class="row">
 
<div class="col-md-3"><h4>Interests</h4></div>
 
<div class="col-md-7">
 
<ul>
 
<li>Communication</li>
 
<li>Media</li>
 
<li>IT innovation</li>
 
<li>Public sphere</li>
 
<li>Public informing</li>
 
<li>Knowledge work</li>
 
</ul>
 
</div> </div>
 
 
 
 
 
<div class="row">
 
<div class="col-md-3"><h4>Seeing our collective mind</h4></div>
 
<div class="col-md-7">
 
[[File:KFvision.jpeg]]
 
<p>
 
By depicting our civilization as a Godzilla-like animal, this <em>ideogram</em> points to the main insight discussed here. The point is to see us all interconnected by modern IT as cells are connected in a human mind. We have gotten a new nervous system. How shall we use it?
 
</p>
 
<p>The point here is that we've inherited the 'algorithm' – which we use to handle knowledge. In the small, and in the large. It has to be federation, not broadcasting. Federation leads to collective intelligence; broadcasting to collective madness.</p>
 
<p>The new information technology is a nervous system. It was conceived to make us 'collectively intelligent'. Yet we've used it to only re-implement the printing press way of working – broadcasting. And the same type of documents.</p>
 
<p>Federation leads to collective intelligence; broadcasting to collective madness!</p>
 
<p>How does this affect us personally? Nietzsche's can be quoted to point to a most interesting possibility: We may be operating in a cognitive and emotional spasm. Unable to comprehend and to act, and only reacting...</p>
 
</div></div>
 
 
 
 
 
<div class="row">
 
<div class="col-md-3"><h4>Consequences</h4></div>
 
<div class="col-md-7">
 
<p>Text</p>
 
</div></div>
 
 
 
 
 
<div class="row">
 
<div class="col-md-3"><h4>Knowledge = Mountain</h4></div>
 
<div class="col-md-7">
 
<p>The "killer app" is a "mountain-building kit". But that's the KF, isn't it?</p>
 
</div></div>
 
 
 
 
 
<div class="row">
 
<div class="col-md-3"><h4>The point</h4></div>
 
<div class="col-md-7"><p>See the <em>collective mind</em> as a kind of a computer. Then the question is – what kind of program is this thing running. The point here is that the program does not at all suit the machine and its systemic role! It's simply a completely wrong program.</p>
 
</div> </div>
 
 
 
<div class="row">
 
<div class="col-md-3"><h4>Resolution</h4></div>
 
<div class="col-md-7"><p>It's federation. The principle is to organize knowledge ACCORDING TO TOPIC – by condensing it to insights. Or [[gestalt|<em>gestalts</em>]].</p> 
 
<p>And [[bootstrapping|<em>bootstrapping</em>]]. Self-organization toward a whole new principle of knowledge work.</p>
 
</div> </div>
 
 
 
 
 
<div class="row">
 
<div class="col-md-3"><h4>Formulation</h4></div>
 
<div class="col-md-7">
 
<p>Text</p>
 
</div></div>
 
  
  
 
<div class="row">
 
<div class="row">
<div class="col-md-3"><h4>Story</h4></div>
+
<div class="col-md-3"><h4>Instead of a definition</h4></div>
<div class="col-md-7">
+
<div class="col-md-7"><p>
<p>The Incredible History of Doug has already been told in so many places. Begins with Bush's observation. What might be <em>the</em> largest contribution to human knowlege? Why didn't the Silicon Valley <em>get it</em>?</p>  
+
<em>Seeing things whole</em> and <em>making things whole</em> leads to <em>holotopia</em>. </p>
</div></div>
+
<p>Turning on the light. Learning to use information and knowledge as they best may serve us.</p>
 +
<p>When we develop the capability to use knowledge to illuminate what is hidden and see the whole – then a whole <em>new</em> order of things is seen as both necessary and possible; and we become empowered to create it. </p>  
 +
<p>We called this new order of things <em>holotopia</em>, to point to the similarities and the differences it has compared to the more common utopias. Like the utopias, the <em>holotopia</em> is a highly desirable view of the future. Indeed, we feel it is <em>more</em> desirable than the utopias tend to be. And unlike the utopias, the <em>holotopia</em> is readily <em>realizable</em>. Indeed, the <em>holotopia</em> is ready to emerge almost by itself, as soon as we allow ourselves to see things differently. The reason is that we already own the knowledge needed for its fulfillment.</p>  
 +
<p>Another reason for this name is that the <em>holotopia</em> naturally results when we embrace [[wholeness|<em>wholeness</em>]] (making things whole) as value, and as a rational goal. </p>
  
<div class="row">
+
<p>As an insight or a vision, the <em>holotopia</em> changes the tone of our engagement with contemporary realities and with our future quite thoroughly. Although many of us may not live to experience the new order it envisions – it is <em>now</em>, before the fulfillment, that the creative opportunities abound! </p>
<div class="col-md-3"><h4>Action</h4></div>
+
<p><em>Holotopia</em> also changes the way we go about <em>handling</em> the contemporary issues—both those large ones, and those smaller and even personal ones: Instead of fixing, we focus on rebuilding; instead of struggling with "problems" within the existing order of things, we focus on <em>changing</em> that order of things. </p> </div> </div>  
<div class="col-md-7">
 
<p>[[bootstrapping|<em>bootstrapping</em>]]</p>  
 
</div></div>
 
  
<div class="row">
 
<div class="col-md-3"><h4>Keywords</h4></div>
 
<div class="col-md-7">
 
<p>[[knowledge federation|<em>federation</em>]] </p>
 
</div></div>
 
  
 
<div class="row">
 
<div class="row">
<div class="col-md-3"><h4>Prototypes</h4></div>
+
<div class="col-md-3"><h4>Understanding holotopia</h4></div>
<div class="col-md-7">
+
<div class="col-md-7"><p>The insight we call the <em>holotopia</em> is made concrete and palpable in terms of [[five insights|<em>five insights</em>]], about five large and centrally important themes of interest. Each of them <em>alone</em> is sufficient to see the need and the possibility of a profound, Renaissance-like change. Even more interesting, however, are their relationships, which show why we cannot realistically make the changes that any of them points to – without acting on all of them. Together, the [[five insights|<em>five insights</em>]] make transparent the paradoxical insight that the <em>holotopia</em> stands for:</p>
<p>Text</p>  
+
<blockquote>Comprehensive change can be easy – even when smaller and obviously necessary changes may be impossible.</blockquote>
</div></div>
 
 
 
  
* Back to [[five insights]].
+
</div> </div>

Revision as of 15:10, 27 February 2020

This article is about holotopia as a keyword. For the corresponding prototype, see Holotopia prototype.


Instead of a definition

Seeing things whole and making things whole leads to holotopia.

Turning on the light. Learning to use information and knowledge as they best may serve us.

When we develop the capability to use knowledge to illuminate what is hidden and see the whole – then a whole new order of things is seen as both necessary and possible; and we become empowered to create it.

We called this new order of things holotopia, to point to the similarities and the differences it has compared to the more common utopias. Like the utopias, the holotopia is a highly desirable view of the future. Indeed, we feel it is more desirable than the utopias tend to be. And unlike the utopias, the holotopia is readily realizable. Indeed, the holotopia is ready to emerge almost by itself, as soon as we allow ourselves to see things differently. The reason is that we already own the knowledge needed for its fulfillment.

Another reason for this name is that the holotopia naturally results when we embrace wholeness (making things whole) as value, and as a rational goal.

As an insight or a vision, the holotopia changes the tone of our engagement with contemporary realities and with our future quite thoroughly. Although many of us may not live to experience the new order it envisions – it is now, before the fulfillment, that the creative opportunities abound!

Holotopia also changes the way we go about handling the contemporary issues—both those large ones, and those smaller and even personal ones: Instead of fixing, we focus on rebuilding; instead of struggling with "problems" within the existing order of things, we focus on changing that order of things.


Understanding holotopia

The insight we call the holotopia is made concrete and palpable in terms of five insights, about five large and centrally important themes of interest. Each of them alone is sufficient to see the need and the possibility of a profound, Renaissance-like change. Even more interesting, however, are their relationships, which show why we cannot realistically make the changes that any of them points to – without acting on all of them. Together, the five insights make transparent the paradoxical insight that the holotopia stands for:

Comprehensive change can be easy – even when smaller and obviously necessary changes may be impossible.