Difference between revisions of "Holotopia: Convenience Paradox"

From Knowledge Federation
Jump to: navigation, search
m
m
Line 1: Line 1:
 
<center><h2><b>H O L O T O P I A</b></h2></center><br><br>
 
<center><h2><b>H O L O T O P I A</b></h2></center><br><br>
  
<div class="page-header" ><h1>Title</h1></div>
+
<div class="page-header" ><h1>Convenience Paradox</h1></div>
  
 
<div class="row">
 
<div class="row">
Line 20: Line 20:
 
<li>the happiness that is not an immediate but a long-term consequence of our actions</li>  
 
<li>the happiness that is not an immediate but a long-term consequence of our actions</li>  
 
<li>our own ability to feel—i.e. the way we respond emotionally to the stimuli from the outside</li>  
 
<li>our own ability to feel—i.e. the way we respond emotionally to the stimuli from the outside</li>  
</li>  
+
</ul>
 
</p>  
 
</p>  
 
</div> </div>
 
</div> </div>

Revision as of 13:12, 9 April 2020

H O L O T O P I A



Pitch

The Renaissance emancipated our distant ancestors from a worldview where the happiness can only be attained in the hereafter. The culture changed thoroughly; and the arts blossomed. Could a similar change be in store for us today?


Scope

Without suitable information to show us the way, we have confused happiness with convenience—with what feels desirable, what appears to make our lives enjoyable and easy. Hence two two large aspects of happiness have remained in the shadow:

  • the happiness that is not an immediate but a long-term consequence of our actions
  • our own ability to feel—i.e. the way we respond emotionally to the stimuli from the outside

View

Text

Ideogram

Text

I M A G E
Caption

Stories

Story 1

Text

I M A G E
Caption

Story 2

Text

I M A G E
Caption


Actions

Action 1

Text


Action 2

Text

Back to Five insights