BCN 2011 - Resources
From Knowledge Federation
In this space we are starting to organize our contributions to "Co-Creating an Innovation Ecosystem for Good Journalism" and improvize a federation process, leading towards a shared vision – what we want Journalism to be like, and how it will function, technically and socially.
Contents |
Transdiscipline Track contributions
Members and Contributions
To make a personal contribution to this project, please create your own personal page based on the examples provided below, and use it to organize your contributions. Provide your contributions in terms of short hypertext files, so that they can be linked from appropriate places (subjects) in the Domain Map.
- Raquel Herrera
- Dino Karabeg
- Roy Lachica
- David Price
- Enrique Rodriguez
- Larry Tod Willson
- Xavier Mas de Xaxàs
- Jack Park
- Stian Danenbarger
Domain Map
We use this domain map to organize key resources; we edit it together, Wikipedia style. The top-level node – KFMC (for Knowledge Federation Media Channel) should ultimately contain only the basic KFMC design, and a brief justification. Next-level nodes (the five sections listed below the KFMC one) serve for organizing resources related to corresponding aspect of the KFMC design.
KFMC
Here we describe our current vision for the Knowledge Federation Media Channel.
- Suggested features by Roy Lachica.
Issues
In this space we describe issues that motivate KFMC. What is public informing lacking? What issues should we aim to address when creating the media channel?
- The problems with the media by Roy Lachica
- Some challenges that journalism is facing by Dino Karabeg
Tools
What tools should we consider using for (the innovation ecosystem for) good journalism? What functionality/advantages do they contribute? The final solution will use the tools as building blocks.
- Navigating relational information spaces by Jack Park
Background
When innovating 'outside the box', we are helped by key insights, reached for ex. in relevant academic disciplines. And of course, by our own insights. What insights should we consider?
Methodology
Here we organize the 'how' part – what methods should we consider using?
Prototypes
We can learn from similar projects and efforts. Which ones should we look at?
- http://debategraph.org/Future_of_Newspapers
- http://debategraph.org/CNN_Amanpour
- http://debategraph.org/Stream.aspx?nID=28176&sd=y&id=B27ECE8F-D151-4CE3-B955-C574757C3C62
- http://www.knightdigitalmediacenter.org/
- http://pulitzercenter.org/
- http://www.forumforthefuture.org
- http://www.npr.org/
- http://www.koios.org/
- http://www.worldpolicy.org
- http://ibis.topicspaces.org/
- http://www.wikidiario.info
- http://www.notecalles.info
- http://hybridwisdom.com
REFERENCES
Here we list references recommended by our members. When you find a reference that you feel is more useful or striking than others, please feel free to bring it to the top.
- P. Bourne, et al.: Force11 White Paper: Improving The Future of Research Communications and e-Scholarship
- Michael Nielsen: Reinventing Discovery - The New Era of Networked Science. Book that just came out.
- http://debategraph.org/Future_of_Newspapers
- Bill Densmore's From Paper to Persona – Sustaining Journalism in the Attention Age.
- Jonathan Stray's Designing Journalism to be Used
- Jim Romenesko There are systemic problems in the current practice of Web journalism
- Ethan Zuckerman wants you to eat your (news) vegetables — or at least have better information
- niemanlab.org The Nieman Journalism Lab is a collaborative attempt to figure out how quality journalism can survive and thrive in the Internet age.
- onlinejournalismblog.com Paul Lewis: How “citizen journalism” aided two major Guardian scoops (guest post)
